
Buckle up folks, it's going to be a bumpy ride! Yesterday, hundreds of Department of Education employees received noticed to stay home and many, will likely be laid off before March 21, 2025.
For consultants AND educators like myself, the future is unknown and the state of education is unstable - to say the least. I am sharing an podcast from NPR (2025) which I know is "left leaning" and I am also sharing an article from The Hill (2023) which tends to lean "right." Regardless of your political persuasion, I hope every student and parents of current students or future students will take some time to consider the impact of dismantling the Department of Education.
First, many believe there is duplicity in job focus or goals between the Department of Education's protection of civil rights (Title I) and the Department of Justice's investigation & prosecution of civil rights violations. Removing the Department of Education could result in a single agency handling all claims, investigations and case resolution - to include guidance on punishment, policy changes or other federal regulatory processes. Will personnel at the Department of Justice have the time, expertise and resources to carry-out the newly assigned duties?
Second, with half of the Department of Education's federal arm laid off, what national guidance remains to standardize education policy? While there have been controversial ideas and themes taught at various levels of K-12 education, this is NOT NEW. Prior to the Department of Education being created, many women in the 1950s and 1960s were discouraged from attending post-secondary education and while in high school, assigned to tracts in shorthand, typewriting, filing and other secretarial-type work. During the same time, men who returned from military service used GI Bills to attend college, enter the work force in manufacturing and industry; however, the gender-based education was questioned for discriminatory practices, finally being removed. Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ended segregation in public schools and Perez v. Sturgis (2023) allowed students with special needs to seek redress when their rights to free public education had been violated. Will these landmark cases remain without strong federal support?
Some claim the Department of Education has overstepped and infringed upon parental rights regarding content taught in public schools. Yet, history about racial violence, discrimination, religious conflict, science of evolution versus creation and many more topics have more than one viewpoint. Science-backed research with data & facts exist for every conversation on these topics and more than one view exists. This is not infringment of parental rights. Instead, teaching students to think critically about the information they receive and interpret data from their own perspective is the foundation of a strong citizenship. Without any regulation or standardization of education expectations, states and local governments will be left to determine curriculum, hiring practices, use of student test scores (if testing even remains) and other means to evaluate the progress and even future employment opportunities for graduates. Do you know who is on your school board? Do you know what policies your school board may implement that may help or hinder your student?
Finally, the push for manufacturing jobs. will not be as swift and within the old-style, assembly line context as many may envision. Instead, I am sharing links to a recent report/article from Jasmine Cui (2025) at MSNBC analyzing the challenges facing the new American manufacturing revoluation. There is an international landscape based on trade, manufacturing and consumerism that left unchecked to a free-market, can self-correct. I am not an economist, however, I do understand the basics of supply and demand related to pay and ability to purchase. When those concepts are connected to a shaky education system, I am fearful for the future. Having an uneducated electorate does not serve the future success of a nation - history tells us that.
This Forbes article (2025) details the level of education and makes future predictions for what manufacturing will look like under the new administration. We may have supply chain issues for components needed to manufacture goods in the United States. We may have a demand for tech saavy and forward-thinking business managers - both require formal training and certifications linked to post-secondary education. What will be the determining factors for who gets higher paying jobs and who fills the assembly line vacancies?
The bottom line: the national conversation and debate on higher tariffs, increased manufacturing, inflation and gutting several federal agencies, not just the Department of Education, will have monumental impacts to every American - regardless of your political persuasion. Without an informed citizenry taught to question authority and think critically, the American education system is in crisis.